ANS

ATM Testing -- ANS

Curtis Villamizer

ANS

Table of Contents

ATM NAP Progress - NANOG February 1995

Provided here are the slides to be used in a presentation in which ATM NAP progress and performance issues are discussed at North American Network Operations Group (NANOG) meeting held on February 9-10, 1995. The actual source is HTML. The HTML source is processed by a perl program which extracts the major bullets and expresses them in slitex.

The HTML version provides the content of the slides in a form more convenient for browsing on the web and provides additional detail. In the HTML, the individual slides are separated by horizontal rules. Small inline images of the graphs are provided, but larger images are available by selecting the smaller image (clicking on it for most HTML readers).

The URL is: http://tweedledee.ans.net/nanog-feb-1995/atm-nap-progress.html. Please also check http://tweedledee.ans.net/nanog-oct-1994/ to see previous work in this area.


ATM NAP Progress

next


NAPs as critical exchange points

next


Measuring NAP Quality of Service

next


Problems with the ATM NAPs

next


ADSU transmit queue buffering

next


ADSU leaking reassemble buffer pool

next


Number of ADSU reassemble buffers

next


Problems due to ATM cell drop

next


Performance Test Results

next


Performance Outlook

next


Plans for Further Testing

next


AADS Joint Testing Facility


Please send comments to Curtis Villamizar


Stan Barber's Notes

NAP Quality of Service is HARD to measure. Aggregate goodput is hard to measure as is fairness.

Mark Knopper asks if the lower MTU could be used at the FDDI NAPS. Sean Doran says that 1-2% of the traffic he sees on Sprintlink is at the FDDI MTU (4470). ATM Cell drops may be a problem, but it would be masked by the ADSU problems.

The fixed Kentrox did definately get better, but there is still problems. With one flow, the Cisco will have a lower utilization (even with the fixed Kentrox at large window sizes ( > 1530 or so).

With delay, the larger the delay, the window size becomes a big factor. Good performance is only available over a very limited range of window sizes.

With a large number of flows, performance remains good at 120 millisecond delay.

With flows in both directions, throughput drops by about 40% on average over a large number of window sizes. However, this may show a problem with the ADSU.

An ADSU solution may provide adequate performance at current traffic levels. When congestions happens, it is unclear what would happen. Fairness issues also need to be studied. The vBNS requirements cannot be met by the current ATM NAP architecture. Curtis believes larger buffers in the ATM switch is a step towards meeting the vBNS requirements.

Further testing will involve using tcpdump to measure individual goodputs, more study of aggregate goodput, comparsion of ingress utilizations looking at fairness (perhaps using SNMP).


Copyright © 1995 Stan Barber. Reproduction with attribution granted.
Academ Consulting Services
P.O. Box 300481
Houston, Texas 77230-0481
Comments via email to www@academ.com